IMPRS Retreat 2024

Survey

IMPRS Retreat 2024 Feedback Survey

Background

Affiliation*

MPI

CAU

GEOMAR

Department/Research Group (Only to access the relevance of the talk to your field of work)

Status*

Student

PI

Social Activities

Common point Ice breaker
Back-to-Back Science Drawing game
Collab Interdisciplinary Group discussion game
Tour through the German Dome and Bundestag

How much would you rate the common point ice breaker?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

How much would you rate the Collab interdisciplinary group discussion game?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

How much would you rate the back-to-back science drawing game?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

How much would you rate the tour of German Church and the Bundestag?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

Is there anything specific you would like to say about the social activities? How was your experience?

Scientific talks

Talks by
Dr. Edda Schulz, MPI - MG
Dr. Eva Lievens, Universität Konstanz
Dr. Bartlomiej Waclaw, The University of Edinburgh
Dr. Elena Damm, Berlin Institute of Health in der Charité

Did you find the talk by Dr. Edda Schulz on Molecular decision-making at the Xist locus relevant and informative?

No selection

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neither

Agree

Strongly Agree

Did you find the talk by Dr. Eva Lievens on the evolution of host range relevant and informative?

No selection

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neither

Agree

Strongly Agree

Did you find the talk by Dr. Bartlomiej Waclaw on the physics of growth and evolution of microbial biofilms relevant and informative?

No selection

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neither

Agree

Strongly Agree

Did you find the talk by Dr. Elena Damm on 'A career "inside" academia' relevant and informative?

No selection

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neither

Agree

Strongly Agree

Is there anything specific you would like to say about the scientific talks? How was your experience?

Workshops

Workshops I:
• How to review a paper and how this improves my
own writing • Starting Your PhD at MPI: How to Get Off to a Good Start • Science Dreamwork
Workshop II:
• Improving figure Design

Which workshop did you attend in session I?

No selection

How to review a paper and how this improves my own writing. Prof. Dr. Jens Rolff, Freie Universität Berlin

Starting Your PhD at MPI: How to Get Off to a Good Start. Dr. Christin Nyhoegen, Freie Universität Berlin

Science Dreamwork for Grant Applications. Dr. Laurel Raffington, MPI for Human Development

Did you find the workshop relevant and informative?

No selection

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither

Agree

Strongly agree

Did you find the workshop II: Improving figure Design relevant and informative?

No selection

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither

Agree

Strongly agree

Is there anything specific you would like to say about the workshops? How was your experience?

Venue

Harnack House

How much would you rate the venue?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

How much would you rate the accommodation?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

How much would you rate the food?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

Is there anything specific you would like to say about the Harnack House? How was your experience?

Others

Which part of the retreat did you like? (You can select more than one.)

Social activites

Science talks

Workshops

Venue

Food

Networking

None

Which part of the retreat needs improvement? (You can select more than one.)

Social activites

Science talks

Workshops

Venue

Food

Networking

None

Did you find the optional bringing of scientific posters relevant?

Yes

No

Did you find the 'Explain your science badly' wall relevant?

Yes

No

Did you enjoy the retreat?

Yes

No

How much would you rate the retreat?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

How much would you rate the organization of the retreat?

No selection

1 (Poor)

2 (Fair)

3 (Good)

4 (Very Good)

5 (Excellent)

Is there anything else you would like us to know? Please comment here whether it was something you enjoyed and wish to see repeated or something you wish to include in the next retreat.

Back

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.